© Gotham/GC Images
Taylor Swift’s sexuality has been a subject of speculation for years, and a recent opinion piece in the New York Times attempting to analyze alleged coded messages in her work took the discussion to an inappropriate level. The article, written by editor Anna Marks, dissected LGBTQ references and symbols spanning Swift’s career in an effort to suggest she may secretly identify as queer. However, sources close to Swift say the intrusive piece was where journalists should not have ventured.
An insider explained Marks’ theory has irritated those around Swift. “Because of her massive success, in this moment there is a Taylor-shaped hole in people’s ethics” they remarked. They noted the Times would never publish such a piece speculating on the sexuality of a male artist. According to the source, no line appears off limits when discussing Swift, regardless of inaccuracies or sensitivities.
While Swift has consistently advocated for LGBTQ fans and allies, creating safe spaces at her shows, she has stated clearly in interviews that she is simply an ally rather than a member of the community herself. As the insider pointed out, she aims to champion all groups facing oppression, particularly as rights come under threat. Swift acknowledges in her 2019 Vogue cover story that she could not fully understand advocating for a community she is not part of until recently.
Making unfounded claims about someone’s sexuality goes too far, even under the guise of commentary or to inspire discussion. Swift deserves the same respect around her personal life that she shows others. With her impact and influence comes boundless speculation, but digging into purported hidden meanings crosses a line into territory best left private. While advocacy and symbolism in art spark valid conversations, one’s identity is theirs alone to define.
Taylor Swift made headlines in 2022 as the top celebrity polluter according to one report, though her team disputes the claim. Read Here
